ファスレーン365

核兵器をなくすきっかけがイギリスに!

スポンサーサイト

上記の広告は1ヶ月以上更新のないブログに表示されています。
新しい記事を書く事で広告が消せます。
このページのトップへ

イギリス首相官邸からの手紙の内容

手紙の文章を以下に紹介します.この問題での定型文なのでしょうが,次回に署名を送るときには,一応は反論文も入れなければならなくなりました.
これに,イギリス議会の議事録の一部が同封されていました.

_____________
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200607/cmhansrd/cm061204/debtext/61204-0003.htm
このページの次の章
4 Dec 2006 : Column 21 Trident

さらに,
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200607/cmhansrd/cm061204/debtext/61204-0004.htm
このページの,次の発言の前まで.
Mr. David Cameron (Witney) (Con): Let me say straight away that I agree with the Prime Minister ....

つまり,4 Dec 2006の議事録のColumn 21からColumn 24までが同封されていました.
_____________

では,手紙の本文です.

_____________

10 DOWNING STREET
LONDON SW1A 2AA

From the Direct Communications Unit 28 February 2007


Mr Kouichi Toyoshima
245-11Toyoda
Yamamoto-machi
Kurume-shi 839-0827
Japan


Dear Mr Toyoshima

I am writing on behalf of the Prime Minister to thank you for your recent letters and enclosed petition regarding Trident.

Mr Blair would like to reply personaliy, but as I hope you will appreciate, he receives many thousands of letters each week and this is not always possible.

As you may be aware, on 4 December 2006, the Government published a White Paper setting out plans to maintain the UK's nuclear deterrent. I enclose a copy of the statement that the Prime Minister made to the House of Commons that day explaining the Government's decision. Essentially, the Government's judgment was that, on balance. it could not be certain in the decades ahead that a major nuclear threat to the UK's strategic interests will not emerge; that there is also a new and potentially hazardous threat from states such as North Korea which claims already to have developed nuclear weapons or lran which is in breach of its non-proliferation duties; that there is a possible connection between some of those states and international terrorism; that it is noteworthy that no present nuclear power is or is even considering divesting itself of its nuclear capability unilaterally; and that in these circumstances, it would be unwise and dangerous for Britain. alone of any of the nuclear powers, to give up its independent nuclear deterrent.

Some have argued that this decision did not need to be taken now. But the fact is that the Vanguard submarines, which carry the Trident missiles, will start to near the end of their service life in the early 2020s. That will be after a five year extension. Given the time it takes to design and build new submarines, a decision needed to be taken now as whether or not to do so.

The costs of replacing the submarines will be refmed as detailed discussions with industry progress. The Government's current estimate is that the procurement costs of the new submarines and associated equipment and infrastructure will be in the region of ?15-20 billion (at 2006/07 prices) for a four submarine fleet, although the Government will be assessing whether it could maintain the deterrent with just three. The costs will fall principally in the period between 2012 and 2027.

The decision to replace the Trident system does not in anyway weaken the Government's commitment to the nuclear Non-Proliferatlon Treaty (NPT). which the Government regards as the cornerstone of the international non-proliferation and disarmament regime. This issue was covered in detail in the White Paper, and in the supporting fact sheets, which are available on the Minlstry of Defence (MOD) website (www.mod.uk). Maintaining a minimum nuclear deterrent is fully consistent with all the UK's international legal obligations. including those under the NPT. The UK is, in fact, the only nuclear weapons state recognised under the NPT to have a deterrent based on a single platform, delivery system and warhead design, and have already significantly reduced the scale and readiness of the Trident system.

In addition to this, the White Paper announced that the Government has decided to reduce the number of operationally available nuclear warheads to less than 160, a cut of 20 % compared to the previously declared maximum. This means that the UK will have reduced the upper limit on it operationally available nuclear warheads by nearly half since 1997.

I hope that this helps to explain the Government's position on this matter. As the Prime Minister made clear to the House of Commons, there will be a full Parliamentary debate and vote on this issue in the spring. This will allow plenty of time for all interested parties to make their views known.

Yours sincerely

M DAVIES

このページのトップへ

コメント

コメントの投稿


管理者にだけ表示を許可する

トラックバック

トラックバックURLはこちら
http://faslane365.blog86.fc2.com/tb.php/11-daf2f705
この記事にトラックバックする(FC2ブログユーザー)

イギリス[世界の旅]

イギリスグレートブリテンおよび北部アイルランド連合王国(グレートブリテン および ほくぶアイルランドれんごうおうこく)、通称イギリスまたは英国は、西ヨーロッパの北海に位置する国。単に連合王国 (UK) ともいう。グレートブリテンおよび北部アイルランド連合王国the

  • 2007/03/06(火) 20:07:19 |
  • 世界の旅
このページのトップへ

FC2Ad

プロフィール

ファスレーン365日本

Author:ファスレーン365日本
英国の核兵器を更新するかどうかの議論を核廃棄のチャンスに変える運動ファスレーン365.これを支援する日本実行委員会のブログです.
すぐ上の写真のある記事へ
呼びかけ文・連絡先賛同人・団体
リーフレット

カンパ送り先:郵便振替 01720-6-46253,ファスレーン365日本

ブラウン首相宛のネット署名
7月25-26日の日本チームの封鎖は成功裏に終わりました
8月26日の記者会見・報告会の チラシ配布資料(部分)

最近の記事

最近のコメント

最近のトラックバック

月別アーカイブ

カテゴリー

ブロとも申請フォーム

この人とブロともになる

ブログ内検索

RSSフィード

リンク

このブログをリンクに追加する

上記広告は1ヶ月以上更新のないブログに表示されています。新しい記事を書くことで広告を消せます。